7 SUVs That Are Gas Guzzlers Disguised as Eco-Friendly
Automakers quickly slap “eco-friendly” and “efficient” labels on their SUVs in today’s environmentally conscious world. But behind the green marketing and hybrid badges, some vehicles continue to consume fuel at alarming rates. These gas-guzzling wolves in eco-friendly sheep’s clothing might look good in advertisements, but they’re far less impressive at the pump.
1. BMW X5 xDrive45e: Hybrid Power, Premium Fuel Consumption
The BMW X5 xDrive45e is marketed as a technological marvel with its plug-in hybrid system promising the best of both worlds. However, once the electric-only range of approximately 30 miles is depleted, this luxury SUV reveals its true nature.
In real-world testing, owners report significantly lower fuel economy than the advertised figures. According to Consumer Reports, many hybrid vehicles fall short of their EPA estimates, with some luxury models like the BMW X5 hybrid showing discrepancies of up to 24% below advertised mpg ratings.
The combination of a heavy chassis, performance-oriented tuning, and a thirsty six-cylinder engine means this “eco-friendly” option still demands premium fuel and delivers disappointing efficiency for a vehicle with “hybrid” in its name.
2. Mercedes-Benz GLS600 Maybach: Mild Hybrid, Major Consumption
The Mercedes-Benz GLS600 Maybach features a 48-volt mild hybrid system that the company promotes as an efficiency enhancement. Yet, according to EPA estimates, this luxury behemoth achieves a mere 15 mpg combined.
The mild hybrid technology does little to offset the vehicle’s 6,000+ pound weight and powerful twin-turbo V8. Despite the eco-friendly marketing, the GLS600 will cost owners approximately $3,950 annually in fuel costs and an extra $11,500 in fuel expenses over five years compared to the average vehicle, according to FinanceBuzz.
Mercedes markets the mild hybrid system as innovative technology for sustainability, but this system primarily enhances performance rather than significantly reducing fuel consumption.
3. Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe: Electric Dreams, Gas Reality
The Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe plug-in hybrid promises 25 miles of all-electric range and impressive fuel economy figures. However, owners report a significant gap between advertised and real-world performance.
Forum discussions reveal widespread disappointment, with many owners struggling to achieve even close to the advertised efficiency. One owner noted, “After 7,500 miles, the computer shows combined 29 MPG. It is advertised as 35 MPG combined.”
The Grand Cherokee 4xe’s hefty weight, boxy aerodynamics, and performance-oriented powertrain mean that fuel economy plummets once the battery is depleted. The vehicle’s total cost of ownership reaches approximately $70,241 over five years, with fuel costs alone totaling $17,023.
4. Ford Expedition Hybrid: Big Size, Bigger Appetite
Ford’s Expedition Hybrid represents the company’s attempt to greenwash its full-size SUV lineup. Despite its hybrid badging and eco-friendly marketing, this massive vehicle achieves only around 17 mpg combined.
The hybrid system provides minimal benefit given the vehicle’s enormous size and weight. Ford’s marketing emphasizes the hybrid technology while downplaying the reality that this remains one of the thirstiest vehicles on the road.
The Expedition’s aluminum body panels were intended to reduce weight and improve efficiency, but reliability issues and high maintenance costs further undermine its eco-credentials. Transmission problems can lead to repair bills exceeding $6,200.
5. Hyundai Tucson Hybrid: Efficiency Gap
The Hyundai Tucson Hybrid is marketed as a fuel-sipping alternative to conventional SUVs, with EPA estimates suggesting 38 mpg combined. However, real-world testing by Cars.com found the actual performance significantly lower at 33.6 mpg.
Owners have expressed frustration with the discrepancy between advertised and actual fuel economy. One Reddit user complained, “If I remember right, Hyundai did the mpg test at 48 mph. Anything above it, you will not see the advertised mpg”.
The gap between laboratory testing and real-world driving conditions means many buyers expecting significant fuel savings are left disappointed when their “eco-friendly” purchase fails to deliver.
6. GMC Yukon XL Denali: Mild Hybrid, Wild Consumption
GMC promotes its Yukon XL Denali with Dynamic Fuel Management and a mild hybrid system as advanced fuel-saving technology. Yet this massive SUV achieves only 16-17 mpg combined, making it one of the least efficient vehicles on the road.
The staggering total cost of ownership reaches $92,343 over just five years, with fuel expenses totaling $16,229.
Despite marketing emphasizing efficiency technologies, the Yukon XL’s poor fuel economy is particularly problematic in today’s market, where even large SUVs are expected to deliver reasonable efficiency.
7. Lexus 600h L: Luxury Hybrid, Economy Disappointment
The Lexus 600h L hybrid luxury SUV promises the perfect blend of opulence and efficiency. However, according to GOBankingRates, it delivers a combined 20 MPG, tying with the BMW ActiveHybrid 7 for the worst fuel efficiency among hybrids.
This disappointing performance undermines the vehicle’s eco-friendly marketing and raises questions about the value of its hybrid system. The real-world efficiency falls dramatically short of expectations for a vehicle specifically marketed as a green alternative in the luxury segment.
Why the Eco-Friendly Facade Fails
The disconnect between marketing claims and real-world performance stems from several factors:
Testing procedures: EPA tests often don’t reflect real-world driving conditions. According to automotive engineer Mike Duoba from Argonne National Laboratory, “The EPA tests were originally designed to test emissions, not fuel economy,”.
Weight issues: Many hybrid SUVs remain extremely heavy, negating much of the efficiency benefit from their hybrid systems.
Performance focus: Manufacturers often use hybrid technology to boost performance rather than maximize efficiency.
Marketing over substance: Green branding sells vehicles, even with minimal environmental benefits.
Making Truly Eco-Friendly Choices
For consumers genuinely concerned about fuel economy and environmental impact, it’s essential to look beyond marketing claims and consider:
- Actual owner-reported fuel economy from sources like fuelly.com
- Vehicle weight and aerodynamics
- Real-world range for plug-in hybrids
- Total cost of ownership, including fuel expenses
The most fuel-efficient SUVs for 2025 include models like the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid (37 mpg combined), Honda CR-V Hybrid (40 mpg combined), and Kia Sportage Hybrid (43 mpg combined), according to Kelley Blue Book.
The Road Ahead: Will Automakers Deliver on Eco Promises?
As emissions regulations tighten globally, automakers face increasing pressure to produce genuinely efficient vehicles. However, the current landscape is filled with “eco-friendly” SUVs that fail to deliver meaningful environmental benefits.
For now, consumers must remain skeptical of green marketing claims and do their research before assuming that hybrid badges guarantee efficiency. The gap between advertised and actual performance remains a significant issue, particularly for larger luxury SUVs marketed as environmentally conscious alternatives.
Have you experienced disappointment with a supposedly eco-friendly SUV? Share your experiences in the comments below!
Read More
SUVs You’ll Wish You Bought Sooner No Matter Your Budget
Travis Campbell is a digital marketer/developer with over 10 years of experience and a writer for over 6 years. He holds a degree in E-commerce and likes to share life advice he’s learned over the years. Travis loves spending time on the golf course or at the gym when he’s not working.