DOJ: Three Men Charged in $74 Million IRS Refund Scheme Involving 16,000 Checks

Three men are facing federal charges in connection with an alleged $74 million IRS tax refund fraud scheme that prosecutors say involved thousands of fabricated tax returns and more than 16,000 government-issued refund checks.
The U.S. Department of Justice announced on October 14, 2026, that Gustavo Rojano Salazar, Gabriel Rojano Salazar, and Andres Huerta Rendon had been charged in the Northern District of Georgia.
Federal prosecutors allege that the three men, who lived in the Atlanta metropolitan area, used identification documents belonging to other individuals to obtain taxpayer identification numbers and file fraudulent federal income tax returns.
The alleged scheme dates back to January 2019 and continued into 2026, according to investigators.
How the Alleged $74 Million IRS Fraud Scheme Worked
According to the DOJ, the defendants allegedly obtained Mexican identification documents issued in the names of third parties and used those documents to apply for Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers (ITINs) through the IRS.
An ITIN is a legitimate tax-processing number issued to certain individuals who need a federal taxpayer identification number but are not eligible for a Social Security number.
After obtaining the numbers, prosecutors allege that the defendants prepared fraudulent tax returns containing fabricated W-2 forms. Those documents reportedly listed income and federal tax withholdings that did not exist.
The false withholding information allegedly caused the IRS to issue refunds that the individuals named on the returns were not entitled to receive.
Investigators say the defendants directed the IRS to send correspondence and Treasury refund checks to post office boxes they controlled.
More Than 16,000 Treasury Checks Allegedly Cashed
Federal prosecutors allege that the three defendants and other participants cashed more than 16,000 U.S. Treasury refund checks worth over $74 million.
The checks were allegedly processed through a check-cashing business in northern Georgia, where investigators say the defendants converted the payments into cash.
To put the scale into perspective, dividing $74 million by 16,000 checks produces approximately $4,625 per check. That is only an illustration based on the figures announced by prosecutors, not a verified average refund amount.
The case highlights how false income and withholding information can potentially be used to generate fraudulent tax refunds when tax-processing safeguards fail to identify discrepancies.
The allegations have not yet been proven in court.
Three Defendants Face Federal Criminal Charges
A federal grand jury returned the indictment on October 6, 2026, and the three defendants were arraigned on October 14.
The charges include conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, mail fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.
Gustavo Rojano Salazar and Gabriel Rojano Salazar also face charges alleging they made false statements on immigration forms.
According to the DOJ, the fraud-related conspiracy and money-laundering charges carry potential maximum penalties of up to 20 years in prison per applicable count. The immigration-related false-statement charges carry maximum penalties of 15 years per count.
Those figures represent statutory maximum penalties, not sentences that have been imposed.
All three defendants are presumed innocent unless prosecutors prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Why Tax Refund Fraud Matters to Ordinary Taxpayers
Tax refund fraud doesn’t just involve the people accused of submitting false returns. It can also create problems for legitimate taxpayers when someone uses their identifying information to file a return without authorization.
For example, a taxpayer who expects a $2,500 refund could discover that the IRS has already received a return using their identifying information. That situation may require additional identity verification and delay the processing of the legitimate return.
The DOJ has not established that every individual whose identity was allegedly used in this particular case experienced those consequences.
However, the allegations demonstrate why protecting tax documents and personal identification information remains important.
Taxpayers should be cautious about sharing Social Security numbers, ITINs, W-2 forms, and other financial records with unfamiliar individuals or unverified tax preparers.
How to Protect Yourself From Tax-Related Identity Theft
The IRS offers several tools that can help taxpayers reduce their exposure to tax-related identity theft.
One option is an Identity Protection PIN, a six-digit number used to help verify a taxpayer’s identity when filing a federal income tax return.
Taxpayers can also review their IRS account information and tax records for unexpected activity.
If the IRS rejects an electronically filed return because another return has already been submitted using the same identifying information, the taxpayer should follow the agency’s identity-theft procedures rather than simply attempting to file repeatedly.
Anyone who suspects tax-related identity theft can find guidance through the IRS Identity Theft Central.
Federal Agencies Continue Investigating the Case
The investigation involves IRS Criminal Investigation, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and Homeland Security Investigations.
The case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia and the DOJ’s National Fraud Enforcement Division.
For ordinary taxpayers, the immediate lesson is not that legitimate ITIN holders are suspicious or that every tax refund is at risk. It is that tax identity information should be protected, unexpected IRS correspondence should be reviewed, and suspicious activity should be addressed promptly.
The criminal case remains pending, and the defendants are entitled to the presumption of innocence throughout the legal proceedings.
Have you ever experienced a delayed tax refund, received an unexpected IRS notice, or discovered someone had used your personal information to file a return? Share your experience in the comments.






