In the automotive world, appearances can be deceiving. Some cars boast aggressive styling, sporty accents, and aerodynamic designs that scream speed, yet under the hood, they lack the performance to match. These vehicles might turn heads at a glance but disappoint when it comes to acceleration and overall driving dynamics. Interestingly, many modern minivans, like the Chrysler Pacifica or Toyota Sienna, offer surprisingly brisk performance, often outpacing these so-called “sports cars.” Let’s delve into seven such cars that look fast but are slower than your average soccer mom’s minivan.

Slow Cars You Assume Would Be Fast

1. Toyota Celica (Seventh Generation)

The seventh-generation Toyota Celica, produced from 1999 to 2006, features a sleek, aerodynamic design that suggests sporty performance. However, the base model comes equipped with a 1.8-liter engine producing just 140 horsepower, resulting in a 0-60 mph time of around 8.5 seconds. Even the higher-performance GT-S trim, with 180 horsepower, doesn’t significantly outperform modern minivans. Despite its racy appearance, the Celica’s performance falls short of expectations. This disparity between looks and actual speed makes it a classic example of cars that look fast but are slow. 

2. Hyundai Veloster Turbo

The Hyundai Veloster Turbo sports a unique three-door design and aggressive styling cues, giving it a sporty demeanor. Its turbocharged 1.6-liter engine delivers 201 horsepower, but the car’s performance doesn’t quite match its looks. With a 0-60 mph time of approximately 7 seconds, it lags behind some modern minivans in acceleration. The Veloster’s emphasis on style over substance places it firmly among cars that look fast but are slow. Enthusiasts seeking genuine performance might find it lacking despite its bold exterior. 

3. Mazda MX-5 Miata (NA and NB Generations)

The Mazda MX-5 Miata is renowned for its lightweight design and exceptional handling, often associated with sporty driving. However, early generations like the NA and NB models prioritize agility over straight-line speed. With engines producing around 115 to 140 horsepower, their 0-60 mph times hover between 8 to 9 seconds. While they offer an engaging driving experience, their acceleration doesn’t match their sporty appearance. Thus, they exemplify cars that look fast but are slow in terms of raw speed. 

4. Subaru BRZ / Toyota 86

The Subaru BRZ and Toyota 86, known for their sleek coupes and rear-wheel-drive layouts, exude a performance-oriented image. Equipped with a 2.0-liter flat-four engine producing 200 horsepower, their 0-60 mph times are around 6.5 to 7 seconds. While they offer balanced handling and driving pleasure, their acceleration figures are modest compared to their sporty design. This contrast places them among cars that look fast but are slow in straight-line performance. Drivers seeking speed may find their expectations unmet despite the cars’ dynamic styling.

5. Chrysler Crossfire

The Chrysler Crossfire, with its distinctive fastback design and muscular stance, suggests high performance. However, its 3.2-liter V6 engine produces 215 horsepower, resulting in a 0-60 mph time of about 6.4 seconds. While not sluggish, it doesn’t deliver the performance its aggressive looks imply. The Crossfire’s emphasis on design over speed categorizes it among cars that look fast but are slow. Enthusiasts might find its performance underwhelming relative to its bold appearance. 

6. Plymouth Prowler

The Plymouth Prowler’s retro hot rod styling, complete with open front wheels and a low-slung body, makes it a visual standout. Despite its appearance, the Prowler is powered by a 3.5-liter V6 engine producing 253 horsepower, achieving 0-60 mph in about 7 seconds. Its performance doesn’t match its aggressive design, leading to disappointment among speed enthusiasts. The Prowler’s focus on aesthetics over acceleration places it firmly among cars that look fast but are slow. Its unique design remains its most notable feature. 

7. DeLorean DMC-12

The DeLorean DMC-12, immortalized by the “Back to the Future” films, boasts gull-wing doors and a stainless-steel body that exudes futuristic speed. However, its 2.8-liter V6 engine produces just 130 horsepower, resulting in a 0-60 mph time of around 8.8 seconds. Despite its iconic status, the DeLorean’s performance is lackluster compared to its appearance. This disparity cements its place among cars that look fast but are slow. Collectors may value its design and cultural significance over its driving dynamics.

The Verdict: Style Over Speed

These seven vehicles exemplify the adage that looks can be deceiving. While they boast designs that suggest high performance, their actual capabilities often fall short, especially when compared to the surprisingly swift modern minivan. For car enthusiasts, it’s a reminder that true performance lies beneath the surface, and a vehicle’s appearance doesn’t always tell the full story. When considering a sporty-looking car, it’s essential to delve into its specifications to ensure it meets performance expectations. After all, sometimes the most unassuming vehicles can leave the flashy ones in the dust.

Have you ever been surprised by a car’s performance—or lack thereof? Share your experiences and thoughts in the comments below!

Read More

Rental Cars With Hidden Crash Histories Are Being Sold to Unknowing Buyers

The Dirty Truth About How Electric Cars Are Scrapped Overseas