<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shifting Your Attitudes [Paradigms]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleverdude.com/content/shifting-your-attitudes-paradigms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleverdude.com/content/shifting-your-attitudes-paradigms/</link>
	<description>Family, Marriage, Finances &#38; Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverdude.com/content/shifting-your-attitudes-paradigms/comment-page-1/#comment-33495</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverdude.com/?p=2020#comment-33495</guid>
		<description>First I love the word paradigm, and not because I am snooty but because it is a key word in computer science education and a key word in the 7 habits of highly effective people.

Call it a paradigm, a rut, negative self talk, whatever its name it all boils down to...

*understanding what is inside you, holding you back from what you want
*identifying where you want to be in the key areas of your life
*identify and take action to get you were you want to go

You don&#039;t need a lot of self-help books if you can work through these complex questions without them. But just like being in shape, everyone knows what it takes (exercise and less calories in than out), we just are not all willing to DO what it takes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First I love the word paradigm, and not because I am snooty but because it is a key word in computer science education and a key word in the 7 habits of highly effective people.</p>
<p>Call it a paradigm, a rut, negative self talk, whatever its name it all boils down to&#8230;</p>
<p>*understanding what is inside you, holding you back from what you want<br />
*identifying where you want to be in the key areas of your life<br />
*identify and take action to get you were you want to go</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t need a lot of self-help books if you can work through these complex questions without them. But just like being in shape, everyone knows what it takes (exercise and less calories in than out), we just are not all willing to DO what it takes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wise Finish</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverdude.com/content/shifting-your-attitudes-paradigms/comment-page-1/#comment-33446</link>
		<dc:creator>Wise Finish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverdude.com/?p=2020#comment-33446</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the good thoughts on paradigms in your life.  It is always good to take a step back and reflect like this.  Your article has reminded me to do that more often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the good thoughts on paradigms in your life.  It is always good to take a step back and reflect like this.  Your article has reminded me to do that more often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverdude.com/content/shifting-your-attitudes-paradigms/comment-page-1/#comment-33401</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverdude.com/?p=2020#comment-33401</guid>
		<description>I have slowly begun my mentality and am very proud of myself right now.  For example I just started my own blog and signed up to take a very unique vacation.  I wouldn&#039;t rely on self-help books, I don&#039;t think you will learn something new.  No one can tell you to walk the walk, you have to be focused and have the motivation for yourself.  If you want to be healthier, it has to come from you, not a book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have slowly begun my mentality and am very proud of myself right now.  For example I just started my own blog and signed up to take a very unique vacation.  I wouldn&#8217;t rely on self-help books, I don&#8217;t think you will learn something new.  No one can tell you to walk the walk, you have to be focused and have the motivation for yourself.  If you want to be healthier, it has to come from you, not a book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverdude.com/content/shifting-your-attitudes-paradigms/comment-page-1/#comment-33374</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverdude.com/?p=2020#comment-33374</guid>
		<description>@Clever, I think you have a causal discrepancy in those Swiss job losses.  Those 10s of thousands of Swiss who lost their jobs were because in order to compete in the digital watch market, they had to completely automate their factories.  Job losses weren&#039;t because they somehow missed the boat on the cheap quartz watch wave.  You don&#039;t pay a watchmaker $70/hr to build a 10cent quartz movement.  The Swiss found success in dressing quartz up and mid to high end quartz watches, though.  The paradigm shift for them wasn&#039;t trying to compete at the low end quartz wave, but on the mid and luxury end watches, which they dominate and which has much higher profit margins.

As for americans and small cars: I guess you forget how chrysler made its turn around.  american automakers were pumping out lots of small cars and it was the japanese who were struggling to compete in the late 70s and 80s.  i agree, with high oil and gas prices, the big 3 were late and perhaps to their final detriment to the small car market; however, the big 3 ruled the light vehicle, suv, minivan market, which is what they focused on in lieu of small to medium passenger vehicles.  I don&#039;t disagree with you that the Big 3 missed this paradigm switch, because they were focused on an unsustainable niche market and because their other products were simply bad.

I don&#039;t disagree with you in general of watch use, however, 17% annual sales increase for mechanicals is by no means indicating that watch use is declining in certain watch segments.  you are also basing your argument that people don&#039;t see watches as another accessory or jewelry, which is what watches have become.  this is why the mid and luxury watch markets have had such a success.  remember Bill Clinton was chastised for wearing a cheap plastic quartz?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Clever, I think you have a causal discrepancy in those Swiss job losses.  Those 10s of thousands of Swiss who lost their jobs were because in order to compete in the digital watch market, they had to completely automate their factories.  Job losses weren&#8217;t because they somehow missed the boat on the cheap quartz watch wave.  You don&#8217;t pay a watchmaker $70/hr to build a 10cent quartz movement.  The Swiss found success in dressing quartz up and mid to high end quartz watches, though.  The paradigm shift for them wasn&#8217;t trying to compete at the low end quartz wave, but on the mid and luxury end watches, which they dominate and which has much higher profit margins.</p>
<p>As for americans and small cars: I guess you forget how chrysler made its turn around.  american automakers were pumping out lots of small cars and it was the japanese who were struggling to compete in the late 70s and 80s.  i agree, with high oil and gas prices, the big 3 were late and perhaps to their final detriment to the small car market; however, the big 3 ruled the light vehicle, suv, minivan market, which is what they focused on in lieu of small to medium passenger vehicles.  I don&#8217;t disagree with you that the Big 3 missed this paradigm switch, because they were focused on an unsustainable niche market and because their other products were simply bad.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t disagree with you in general of watch use, however, 17% annual sales increase for mechanicals is by no means indicating that watch use is declining in certain watch segments.  you are also basing your argument that people don&#8217;t see watches as another accessory or jewelry, which is what watches have become.  this is why the mid and luxury watch markets have had such a success.  remember Bill Clinton was chastised for wearing a cheap plastic quartz?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristy @ Master Your Card</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverdude.com/content/shifting-your-attitudes-paradigms/comment-page-1/#comment-33358</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristy @ Master Your Card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverdude.com/?p=2020#comment-33358</guid>
		<description>You didn&#039;t mention your paradigm shift on the word &quot;paradigm&quot; and the phrase &quot;paradigm shift.&quot; ;) That&#039;s a big step in changing the way you think.

I actually love this word/phrase. Of course, it stems from having taken the Franklin Covey 7 Habits seminar and I wrote a series of posts about it over at MYC. You can read them if you like.

http://masteryourcard.com/blog/2009/01/10/the-seven-habits-to-financial-success-part-one/

There are seven parts to that series as they relate to the seven habits.

We all have the ineffective paradigms and it&#039;s simply a matter of turning them around to a positive. Our biggest problem is the negative self-talk - that will get us more than any other negative influence out there. We have to find a way to turn that off, and really focus on the positive thoughts. For me it was a matter of writing down my feelings in a journal and leaving them there, then telling myself the positive stuff. Tell yourself often enough that it&#039;s going to be a good day, and it will be a good day. 

Good for you for looking to change your perspective and see the positive side of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You didn&#8217;t mention your paradigm shift on the word &#8220;paradigm&#8221; and the phrase &#8220;paradigm shift.&#8221; <img src='http://www.cleverdude.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  That&#8217;s a big step in changing the way you think.</p>
<p>I actually love this word/phrase. Of course, it stems from having taken the Franklin Covey 7 Habits seminar and I wrote a series of posts about it over at MYC. You can read them if you like.</p>
<p><a href="http://masteryourcard.com/blog/2009/01/10/the-seven-habits-to-financial-success-part-one/" rel="nofollow">http://masteryourcard.com/blog/2009/01/10/the-seven-habits-to-financial-success-part-one/</a></p>
<p>There are seven parts to that series as they relate to the seven habits.</p>
<p>We all have the ineffective paradigms and it&#8217;s simply a matter of turning them around to a positive. Our biggest problem is the negative self-talk &#8211; that will get us more than any other negative influence out there. We have to find a way to turn that off, and really focus on the positive thoughts. For me it was a matter of writing down my feelings in a journal and leaving them there, then telling myself the positive stuff. Tell yourself often enough that it&#8217;s going to be a good day, and it will be a good day. </p>
<p>Good for you for looking to change your perspective and see the positive side of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clever Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverdude.com/content/shifting-your-attitudes-paradigms/comment-page-1/#comment-33347</link>
		<dc:creator>Clever Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverdude.com/?p=2020#comment-33347</guid>
		<description>@Tim, good thing you think so because the tens of thousands of workers who lost their jobs because the Swiss decided not to even try to produce digital watches with quartz technology are cheering today.

Would a better example be American automakers and small cars? Probably not because even Toyota and Nissan are posting big losses. I agree just one example can&#039;t explain an entire company or industry downfall, but quartz and small cars was a major technology or product line that could have been predicted as needed if leaders of those companies would have thought just a bit differently, and would have potentially saved thousands of jobs. Time will tell on the Big Three, but history has proven the Swiss fall from power (in volume at least).

However, another example might just be watches in general. Watch use and purchases are continually decreasing as people just use their cell phones as clocks. What will watchmakers do then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tim, good thing you think so because the tens of thousands of workers who lost their jobs because the Swiss decided not to even try to produce digital watches with quartz technology are cheering today.</p>
<p>Would a better example be American automakers and small cars? Probably not because even Toyota and Nissan are posting big losses. I agree just one example can&#8217;t explain an entire company or industry downfall, but quartz and small cars was a major technology or product line that could have been predicted as needed if leaders of those companies would have thought just a bit differently, and would have potentially saved thousands of jobs. Time will tell on the Big Three, but history has proven the Swiss fall from power (in volume at least).</p>
<p>However, another example might just be watches in general. Watch use and purchases are continually decreasing as people just use their cell phones as clocks. What will watchmakers do then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverdude.com/content/shifting-your-attitudes-paradigms/comment-page-1/#comment-33345</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverdude.com/?p=2020#comment-33345</guid>
		<description>@Clever, I don&#039;t think it was at all to their peril.  Yes, swiss watch companies lost market share in entry level watches from the japanese in the 60s and 70s from it&#039;s monopolistic share of 90%.  The Swiss invented the quartz movement, but they decided not to mass produce it.  I think they were correct to do so, because they weren&#039;t going to be able to compete in mass entry level digitals anyways.  Swatch regained marketshare by focusing on mid and high end digital market in the 80s with Swatch.  However, considering quartz has not advanced nor is the market increased, I think the focus on mechanicals and mid and high level digitals in lieu of mass producing basic digitals was the better option  for the Swiss.  The swiss dominate the worldwide luxury watch market with almost 100% market share.  Much of that has to do with consolidation especially under Swatch Watch Group.  luxury market also his much higher profit margins.  Should the swiss have focused on competing in the entry level digitals back then?  I don&#039;t think so, and I don&#039;t think they could have.  I do know that what they focused on was much more profitable, so I&#039;m not so convinced they missed out on anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Clever, I don&#8217;t think it was at all to their peril.  Yes, swiss watch companies lost market share in entry level watches from the japanese in the 60s and 70s from it&#8217;s monopolistic share of 90%.  The Swiss invented the quartz movement, but they decided not to mass produce it.  I think they were correct to do so, because they weren&#8217;t going to be able to compete in mass entry level digitals anyways.  Swatch regained marketshare by focusing on mid and high end digital market in the 80s with Swatch.  However, considering quartz has not advanced nor is the market increased, I think the focus on mechanicals and mid and high level digitals in lieu of mass producing basic digitals was the better option  for the Swiss.  The swiss dominate the worldwide luxury watch market with almost 100% market share.  Much of that has to do with consolidation especially under Swatch Watch Group.  luxury market also his much higher profit margins.  Should the swiss have focused on competing in the entry level digitals back then?  I don&#8217;t think so, and I don&#8217;t think they could have.  I do know that what they focused on was much more profitable, so I&#8217;m not so convinced they missed out on anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clever Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverdude.com/content/shifting-your-attitudes-paradigms/comment-page-1/#comment-33338</link>
		<dc:creator>Clever Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverdude.com/?p=2020#comment-33338</guid>
		<description>@Tim, the Swiss DID ignore quartz to their peril (they even invented it). They went from almost total control of the watch market to under 5% market share thanks to the digital quartz watch. And while mechanical watches may be the best they have ever been, what % of the market do they have? The SWISS missed the boat on that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tim, the Swiss DID ignore quartz to their peril (they even invented it). They went from almost total control of the watch market to under 5% market share thanks to the digital quartz watch. And while mechanical watches may be the best they have ever been, what % of the market do they have? The SWISS missed the boat on that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverdude.com/content/shifting-your-attitudes-paradigms/comment-page-1/#comment-33336</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverdude.com/?p=2020#comment-33336</guid>
		<description>I disagree with the Swiss watchmaker ignoring quartz.  The mechanical watch industry has perhaps never been better than it is now.  Ask Rolex, ask Breitling, as Omega, as Tag Heuer, even Seiko.  Same with audio, there is such a huge industry for analog.

shifting paradigms doesn&#039;t mean going with the flow.  You can carve a niche, do it well and change the smaller paradigm.

the biggest challenge people face is focusing on symptoms rather than the fundamental problem.  Being fat and being in debt are symptoms not the underlying problem, so focusing on losing weight and getting out of debt isn&#039;t solving the problem of changing lifestyle or changing spending behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the Swiss watchmaker ignoring quartz.  The mechanical watch industry has perhaps never been better than it is now.  Ask Rolex, ask Breitling, as Omega, as Tag Heuer, even Seiko.  Same with audio, there is such a huge industry for analog.</p>
<p>shifting paradigms doesn&#8217;t mean going with the flow.  You can carve a niche, do it well and change the smaller paradigm.</p>
<p>the biggest challenge people face is focusing on symptoms rather than the fundamental problem.  Being fat and being in debt are symptoms not the underlying problem, so focusing on losing weight and getting out of debt isn&#8217;t solving the problem of changing lifestyle or changing spending behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Baldwin</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverdude.com/content/shifting-your-attitudes-paradigms/comment-page-1/#comment-33329</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Baldwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverdude.com/?p=2020#comment-33329</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with your thoughts here.  In fact, I just wrote a post this morning that will go out next Wednesday about this topic.  Challenging people to reevaluate their lives and ask the deeper questions of &quot;why&quot;.  The answers to these questions require a paradigm shift (I know you hate that phrase!), but it&#039;s absolutely necessary to continue to improve ourselves and the world we live in.

Great stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with your thoughts here.  In fact, I just wrote a post this morning that will go out next Wednesday about this topic.  Challenging people to reevaluate their lives and ask the deeper questions of &#8220;why&#8221;.  The answers to these questions require a paradigm shift (I know you hate that phrase!), but it&#8217;s absolutely necessary to continue to improve ourselves and the world we live in.</p>
<p>Great stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

